TPUSA spokesperson and longtime executive director for The Charlie Kirk Show, Andrew Kolvet, has set the record straight on the lack of an exit wound in Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Since the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk, dozens of rumors have surfaced online questioning the FBI’s reports that Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter in the Charlie Kirk assassination by citing the lack of an exit wound.
The rumors took off after conservative commentator Candace Owens claimed she viewed the footage of the assassination from behind, and it did not show an exit wound from the back.
WATCH:
BREAKING: Candace Owens has now viewed footage from the missing camera that was BEHIND Charlie Kirk.
She says the video shows no blood and NO sign of an exit wound.
This would DEBUNK the official narrative of a rifle shot from in front.
pic.twitter.com/jglX2JtScF— ADAM (@AdameMedia) September 20, 2025
Kolvet has poured cold water on the “exit wound” theory and has addressed it straight on.
Kolvet, in a post on X, wrote, “I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know.”
He continued, “I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital. He said the bullet ‘absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high powered, high velocity round. I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.’”
The doctor continued to share with Kolvet, “It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed. His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel.”
LOOK:
I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably…
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) September 20, 2025
Full post from Andrew Kolvet:
I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know.
I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital…
He said the bullet “absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high powered, high velocity round. I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.”
But it didn’t go through. Charlie’s body stopped it.
I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent, and he replied:
“It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed.”
“His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.”
In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin.
Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him.
Remarkable. Miraculous.
Kolvet has also addressed the SD cards being removed from cameras at the scene of the assassination.
READ:
The post TPUSA Spokesperson Explains the “Lack of an Exit Wound” in Charlie Kirk’s Assassination, Reveals Coroner Found the Bullet appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.