By applying post-doctoral-level economic analysis, I aim to mathematically and objectively demonstrate that jihadist activity drives countries into technological regression, potentially devolving entire societies to a level of development comparable to the year 1890, given a long enough time horizon.
Using internationally recognized metrics for technological advancement, extremist-controlled territories demonstrate consistent patterns of regression across all major categories. Adult literacy rates remain well below global averages, with Afghanistan at forty-three percent compared to a global average of eighty-six percent. Primary enrollment rates have declined significantly in all examined territories, while secondary and tertiary enrollment have collapsed entirely in many areas.
Scientific output from extremist-controlled regions approaches zero. No meaningful peer-reviewed publications emerge from these territories, patent applications are nonexistent, and international scientific collaboration has been completely severed. Research institutions have been closed, destroyed, or converted to military purposes. The Afghanistan Science Academy, University of Mosul, and Al-Furat University represent examples of once-productive academic centers that no longer contribute to global knowledge production.
Higher education indicators show complete institutional breakdown. Universities have been eliminated from global rankings, STEM graduate production has ceased, and the number of researchers per capita has plummeted due to mass emigration. Gender parity in education has been eliminated entirely in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, which represents the only territory globally with complete prohibition of female education beyond primary levels.
Innovation and industrial capacity indicators reveal the absence of technological advancement infrastructure. No high-tech manufacturing occurs in extremist-controlled areas, technology startups are nonexistent, and venture capital investment is zero. The robotics density, a measure of industrial automation, remains at zero across all examined territories. Digital infrastructure remains severely constrained, with internet penetration rates well below global standards and systematic exclusion of women from digital participation.
The transformation of territories under extremist control follows consistent patterns of institutional dismantling. Initial phases involve ideological purification through targeted elimination of Western-educated professionals and closure of academic departments teaching subjects deemed incompatible with extremist interpretations. Educational curricula are fundamentally altered to eliminate scientific, mathematical, artistic, and social science instruction.
Infrastructure conversion represents the second phase, where universities become military training facilities, libraries are destroyed or converted to propaganda centers, and laboratory equipment is repurposed or eliminated. The third phase involves mass emigration of educated populations, with tens of thousands of skilled professionals fleeing Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover, while Iraqi and Syrian academics relocated to Kurdistan and other regions during ISIS control.
Systematic exclusion characterizes the final phase, where women are banned from educational and research participation, effectively eliminating fifty percent of potential intellectual capacity. Children are redirected from educational pathways toward military training, as evidenced by the recruitment of thousands of boys for militia service in Yemen over a two-year period.
The comprehensive analysis reveals not mere technological stagnation but active regression across measurable indicators. Countries under extremist control move backward on scientific development metrics, often losing decades of progress within months of territorial takeover. Educational infrastructure requiring years to build is systematically destroyed, while human capital accumulated over generations flees or faces elimination.
Research collaboration networks that connect local institutions to global scientific communities are severed entirely. International recognition through university rankings, research citations, and academic awards disappears as institutions close or transform their missions.
The technological paradox becomes apparent through examination of these indicators. Hamas uses drones and the Houthis use reasonably advanced missiles. However, while extremist groups may utilize existing technologies for tactical purposes, they systematically eliminate the educational, research, and institutional foundations necessary for technological innovation and advancement.
The application of comprehensive technological advancement indicators to extremist-controlled territories confirms that these regions experience measurable technological regression rather than mere stagnation. Across thirty-six internationally recognized metrics spanning education, research, innovation, and digital infrastructure, extremist control consistently produces decline toward zero capacity.
The evidence validates characterizations of these groups as fundamentally rejecting the institutional frameworks required for technological progress, even as they may tactically employ existing technologies. The systematic destruction of educational systems, research institutions, and human capital represents a deliberate dismantling of technological advancement capacity, resulting in societies that consume existing innovations while eliminating their ability to contribute to future technological development.
The post Objective Truth about Extremism: An Economist’s Analysis of Jihadist Impact on Technological Regression appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.